arXiv:2603.24828v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Clinical decisions are high-stakes and require explicit justification, making model interpretability essential for auditing deep clinical models prior to deployment. As the ecosystem of model architectures and explainability methods expands, critical questions remain: Do architectural features like attention improve explainability? Do interpretability approaches generalize across clinical tasks? While prior benchmarking efforts exist, they often lack extensibility and reproducibility, and critically, fail to systematically examine how interpretability varies across the interplay of clinical tasks and model architectures. To address these gaps, we present a comprehensive benchmark evaluating interpretability methods across diverse clinical prediction tasks and model architectures. Our analysis reveals that: (1) attention when leveraged properly is a highly efficient approach for faithfully interpreting model predictions; (2) black-box interpreters like KernelSHAP and LIME are computationally infeasible for time-series clinical prediction tasks; and (3) several interpretability approaches are too unreliable to be trustworthy. From our findings, we discuss several guidelines on improving interpretability within clinical predictive pipelines. To support reproducibility and extensibility, we provide our implementations via PyHealth, a well-documented open-source framework: https://github.com/sunlabuiuc/PyHealth.